9/1/2023 0 Comments Hacker textart![]() Beyond that, the handles to mitigate these problems completely differ from how artists reason about them. ![]() and that's just a teeeeeny aspect of that image. For example, I might want to have the edge of a man's sleeve form an imaginary line with the buttons on his shirt that forms a rough logarithmic spiral that terminates in his iris and have the bottom edge of his sleeve which is resting against a table point towards the upper-left-hand corner of the screen, where I'll later place a logo. They also need more granularity to finely control composition in addition to subject matter. The results aren't repeatable enough to perfectly maintain the appearance of an iconic character or logo- an absolute must. Aesthetic controls seem great if you're making something to look at, but lack the precision to maintain completely unbendable branding guidelines or similar constrictions. Unfortunately, those controls are very consequential to professionals. Laypeople love these tools so much because they abstract away a ton of stuff they don't need to think about to satisfy their requirements. Even with premade assets and a back-and-forth with sketches and proofs of concept, it's nearly impossible to write a final specification that perfectly conveys what the deliverable needs. That's why nearly every design contract has a built-in number of included revisions. But natural language is simply a bad way to convey what commercial art deliverables need to be. The systems are capable enough and great for breaking up creative blocks, building mood boards, and other non-deliverable assets or pieces that have deliberately loose reqs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |